Both the basal body and the microtubule‐based axoneme it nucleates have evolutionarily conserved subdomains crucial for cilium biogenesis, function and maintenance. Here, we focus on two conspicuous but underappreciated regions of these structures that make membrane connections. One is the basal body distal end, which includes transition fibres of largely undefined composition that link to the base of the ciliary membrane. Transition fibres seem to serve as docking sites for intraflagellar transport particles, which move proteins within the ciliary compartment and are required for cilium biogenesis and sustained function. The other is the proximal‐most region of the axoneme, termed the transition zone, which is characterized by Y‐shaped linkers that span from the axoneme to the ciliary necklace on the membrane surface. The transition zone comprises a growing number of ciliopathy proteins that function as modular components of a ciliary gate. This gate, which forms early during ciliogenesis, might function in part by regulating intraflagellar transport. Together with a recently described septin ring diffusion barrier at the ciliary base, the transition fibres and transition zone deserve attention for their varied roles in forming functional ciliary compartments.
Cilia are finger‐like organelles that project from the surfaces of most eukaryotic cell types. Motile cilia move fluids and cells, and immotile cilia transduce environmental stimuli and regulate signalling pathways important for development (reviewed in []). The biomedical importance of cilia is becoming increasingly appreciated, as defects in ciliary structure and function are found to cause human diseases or ‘ciliopathies’, typified by cystic kidneys, blindness, obesity, skeletal malformations and nervous system anomalies [,].
All cilia arise from a basal body; a centriolar barrel anchored to the base of the ciliary membrane by transition fibres (Fig 1A,B). At or near this attachment point are docking sites for intraflagellar transport (IFT) particles (Fig 1C; [,]). These membrane‐associated multimeric protein complexes travel along microtubules by using kinesin 2 anterograde and cytoplasmic dynein retrograde molecular motors, and are required for building and maintaining cilia [,,]. At the distal end of the basal body, the plasma membrane gives way to a compositionally distinct membrane that envelops the entire cilium []. Indeed, an important feature of cilia is their compartmentalization, and this property might be bestowed in part by its singular membrane composition. Protein transport between the cytoplasm and cilium is regulated, and facilitates control over cilium‐based signalling [,]. Regulation of ciliary protein entry and exit might depend on proteins at the ciliary base, leading to the idea of a diffusion barrier or ‘gate’ that prevents nonspecific movement of membrane proteins into and out of the cilium []. In this review, we focus on two substructures at the base of cilia, transition fibres and the transition zone, that are important for ciliogenesis and control of ciliary protein composition.
Evolutionarily conserved basal body–ciliary structures
The occurrence of cilia within all major eukaryotic clades and the evolutionary conservation of core ciliary proteins, indicate that the last eukaryotic common ancestor had a structurally sophisticated motile, and probably sensory, cilium that largely resembled that of extant eukaryotes [,]. The most prominent part of the cilium is the axoneme, which is comprised of nine peripheral microtubule doublets surrounding a central pair—the so‐called 9+2 arrangement—in most motile cilia, with the central pair usually lacking in non‐motile (primary) cilia—the 9+0 arrangement (Fig 1A; see [] for treatment of cilium ultrastructure). Axonemes extend from the mother centriole, which is the oldest centriole, inherited during mitosis. During ciliogenesis, the typically triplet microtubule‐containing mother centriole becomes a basal body, distinguished by adornment with appendages projecting from the centriolar barrel.
These appendages come in several forms (Fig 1B). Most proximal (closest to the nucleus) are the subdistal appendages and basal foot. At the basal foot of mammalian cells, ninein, a subdistal appendage component, is recruited by the Odf2 protein and promotes centriolar microtubule nucleation and anchoring [,]. Odf2 itself is required for basal foot formation, which in turn helps coordinate the beat of motile cilia []. Beyond the subdistal appendages lie the distal appendages. During ciliogenesis, the mother centriole anchors to a membrane—the ciliary vesicle or plasma membrane—through the distal appendages, which then become the pinwheel‐shaped transition fibres or alar sheets. In mammalian cells, these structures contain Cep164, and depend on distal centriolar proteins such as Ofd1 for their formation []. Human mutations in OFD1 are associated with orofaciodigital syndrome 1, a ciliopathy characterized by digit malformations and kidney cysts []. Without Ofd1, cells cannot recruit Cep164 to the centriole, form distal appendages, dock the mother centriole to membranes or form cilia. Ofd1 localizes to the distal centriole in a region central to the appendages, a domain also occupied by other distal centriole components, including Poc5 [,]. Super‐resolution microscopy revealed a new centriolar protein, Ccdc123/Cep123, found to co‐localize with Cep164 at the distal appendages []. In all likelihood, additional components of transition fibres will be discovered and their specific roles in ciliogenesis will be uncovered.
Beyond the basal body lies the transition zone, an evolutionarily conserved ciliary subdomain characterized by distinctive Y‐shaped fibres that connect the doublet microtubules to the overlying ciliary membrane (Fig 1A). Y‐links organize, terminate in, or constitute the ciliary necklace, which are circumferential strands of intramembrane ‘decorations’ [] that might in fact form a spiral (Fig 1D; []). The Y‐links are immediately distal to the transition fibres, as both can sometimes be observed, but only in slightly oblique transmission electron microscopy cross‐sections []. Although the composition of the Y‐link and necklace structures is largely unknown, with the probable exception of CEP290/NPHP6 in Chlamydomonas [], proteins with specific transition zone localization and associated functions are good candidates. These include a growing cohort of other ciliopathy proteins implicated in Meckel syndrome (MKS), Joubert syndrome (JBTS), nephronophthisis (NPHP), Senior–Loken syndrome (SLSN) and Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA). A non‐exhaustive list of these proteins is presented in Table 1. Extra features observed within the transition zone of motile cilia, detailed in [], are not discussed further here. These include, for example, the basal plate, which might anchor the central pair required for motility.
There is ambiguity concerning the boundaries of the transition zone with respect to the basal body and ciliary axoneme. For example, one review article on ciliary nomenclature [] suggests that the transition fibres might comprise part of the transition zone. Here, we ascribe the transition fibres as components of the basal body, because they stem directly from the distal end of the centriolar barrel (see the three‐dimensional reconstruction in []). By contrast, we define the transition zone as being part of the proximal‐most region of the axoneme containing doublet microtubules and Y‐links—structural features that form only in ciliated cells (Fig 1). Just beyond the transition zone is the ‘inversin compartment’, which in mammalian cells and Caenorhabditis elegans contains, among other proteins, inversin/NPHP2 [,].
Earliest steps of ciliogenesis
Formation of primary cilia depends on liberating the mother centriole from its centrosomal role in cell division after cytokinesis. In some mammalian cell types, the earliest detectable ciliogenic event is the docking of a ciliary vesicle to the mother centriole (Fig 2; [,]). Whether the centriole selects a ciliary vesicle with special ciliogenic properties for docking, or imposes ciliary characteristics on a naive vesicle, is unclear. Furthermore, whether the basal body appendages implicated in vesicle binding represent mature distal appendages and transition fibres is not certain. Subsequently, the basal body‐ciliary vesicle often, but not always, migrates to the cell surface, an event which in tissue culture cells seems to be dependent on the actin cytoskeleton and, intriguingly, membrane‐associated components of the transition zone (MKS1 and MKS3; [,,]). A second intracytosolic event then initiates, whereby the axoneme elongates, invaginating one face of the ciliary vesicle to create the ciliary membrane. Alternatively, in other cell types, such as multiciliated cells, direct interaction of the basal body with the plasma membrane occurs, followed by extension of the axoneme (Fig 2; see review [] for further details on the ciliogenic pathways observed). In both cases, the forming cilium acquires transition‐zone‐like features along the growing axoneme and ciliary membrane.
On the basis that disruption of one or more transition‐zoneassociated proteins can result in centriole migration or membrane docking and attachment defects, in mammalian cells and the nematode C. elegans, it has been argued that transition zone proteins participate in these early steps of ciliogenesis []. These transition zone proteins probably form supramolecular complexes, the nature and ultrastructural organization of which is only starting to be understood in genetic and proteomic terms [,,,]. Evidence that these expansive complexes might constitute features of transition zone ultrastructure comes from the observed disruption of Y‐links after abrogation of several pairs of transition zone proteins in C. elegans or CEP290 in Chlamydomonas [,,]. In addition to potential structural roles, the inferred transmembrane and membrane‐associated properties of transition zone proteins (for example, MKS2/TMEM216, MKS3/TMEM67 and JBTS14/TMEM237; see Table 1) could confer extra functions during ciliogenesis, such as interaction with vesicular transport machinery, fusion of the ciliary vesicle with the plasma membrane and facilitating the proper anchoring of the basal body to the membrane by securing Y‐link to membrane connections.
Although formation of the ciliary axoneme is widely acknowledged to depend on IFT, there is evidence from different model systems that basal body docking and anchoring, or transition zone formation, does not require this transport system. For example, transition zone formation seems normal in the Chlamydomonas IFT52 mutant, which cannot otherwise build the rest of the axoneme [], as well as in IFT gene mutants in C. elegans [,]. Instead, it is probable that IFT complexes associate with the ciliary or other vesicles, and the basal body, during the early stages of ciliogenesis [,]—ostensibly primed for elongating the axoneme after basal body (transition fibre)–transition zone attachment, to the membrane (Fig 2). Although how these events are coordinated is not understood, at least two IFT proteins, IFT20 and Elipsa/DYF‐11, Bardet–Biedl syndrome (BBS) proteins, and vesicular transport components (such as Rab11, Rab8, rabin 8 and rabaptin 5) seem to partake in ciliary cargo transport from the Golgi to the ciliary base near the basal body [,,,,].Other IFT proteins must be recruited to the ciliary base and assembled to allow IFT particle interactions with ciliary proteins, but such spatio‐temporal details remain to be elucidated.
Formation of ciliary compartment in early ciliogenesis
An essential attribute of the cilium is that it represents a bona fide organelle, with its own transport system, signal transduction molecules and, in the case of motile cilia, force‐generating machinery. Yet, unlike an organelle such as a mitochondrion, which is fully sequestered from the cytosolic environment by a contiguous membrane, the cilium is built whilst ostensibly exposed to non‐ciliary cell body components. If the initial establishment of a ciliary compartment requires isolation from cytosolic and plasma membrane protein pools, then ciliary gate formation might represent one of the earliest steps of ciliogenesis.
Freeze–fracture electron microscopy studies have provided insights into the timing of ciliary necklace formation, which could act as a membrane diffusion barrier. In Tetrahymena, a distinct arrangement of intramembrane particle arrays, termed ‘fairy rings’, form before substantial axonemal outgrowth and the mature ciliary necklace are apparent []. The ring, corresponding roughly to the diameter of basal bodies, is evident on a flat area of the plasma membrane. The emergence of a ciliary membrane protrusion is accompanied by a concentration of intramembraneous particles on the membrane slope. A similar progression of events is reported for motile and non‐motile cilia of vertebrates [], suggesting that this process is conserved.
Presumably, ciliary necklace formation coincides with the assembly of transition zone ultrastructure; however, the electron miscroscopic evidence for this is sparse. Studies of quail oviduct cilium biogenesis hint at the appearance of bead structures in the lumen of ciliary vesicles, as well as the presence of Y‐links in a potentially early phase of transition zone formation []. Studying moth spermatogenesis, the authors of [] visualized regular repeating patterns of membrane‐associated beads in ciliary stumps protruding into the ciliary (flagellar) vesicle. More time‐resolved experiments with molecular markers of the ciliary vesicle, the plasma membrane region in which the basal body docks, the transition zone and the necklace are required to better understand this early ciliogenic pathway.
Apart from the ciliary necklace, other structures probably contribute to the restriction or modulation of ciliary entry and exit. These include transition fibres, Y‐links, nucleocytoplasmic transport machinery and a septin ring. Similarly to the transition zone, the spatio‐temporal events involved in establishing these systems during ciliogenesis remain to be established. Furthermore, how these structures or functional units cooperate to ensure that the protein composition of the cilium remains optimal is not understood and requires further investigation.
Transition fibres: the ‘business’ end of the basal body
In many respects, transition fibres represent the functional region of the basal body. First, they serve as the main membrane attachment point for the basal body. Second, they represent a physical block to transport, as electron micrographs from multiple cell types indicate that the inter‐fibre spaces are too small to allow the passage of vesicles [,,,]. Consistent with this idea, vesicles are typically not observed in cilia [,]. Hence, the point of transition fibre attachment to the plasma membrane defines the limit at which cilium‐destined vesicles can fuse (Fig 3). Indeed, in photoreceptor cells, IFT protein‐ and rhodopsin‐positive vesicles are found at the periciliary ridge membrane, which extends apically ∼0.5 μm from the transition fibre–plasma membrane junction, and some vesicles are observed at the junction itself [,,,].
Third, various proteins are targeted to the transition fibre region. C. elegans and trypanosome RP2 and human SEPT2 both localize in a doughnut‐like fashion (∼500 nm diameter) at the ciliary base, consistent with the transition fibre ring diameter (Fig 3; [,,]). RP2, related to the tubulin folding cofactor C, might provide quality control for tubulins before incorporation into the axoneme, and SEPT2, which we discuss below, is a component of a membrane diffusion barrier. Immunofluorescence studies from multiple cell types and organisms show pools of IFT proteins at the ciliary base, immediately proximal to the transition zone (Figs 1B,3; [,,]). Close examination using immunoelectron microscopy revealed Chlamydomonas IFT52 at the distal ends of transition fibres []. Similarly, all studied C. elegans IFT‐associated proteins, namely core IFT and BBS proteins, concentrate within the transition fibre region (Fig 1C; []). In photoreceptor cells, IFT proteins are found at the centriolar barrel subdistal and distal appendages (Fig 2; [,]). Several IFT proteins, IFT57/88/140, are also observed at the groove in which the ciliary membrane transitions to periciliary membrane, consistent with the transition fibre attachement region []. Hence, transition fibres are important docking and assembly sites for IFT proteins, and are integral to cilium formation and function.
Finally, it is striking that in C. elegans, basal bodies degenerate almost completely post‐ciliogenesis, with the exception that transition fibres persist (Fig 1A; [,]). At least some core centriolar proteins, for example SAS‐4, disappear completely, whereas another protein implicated in cilium formation, HYLS‐1, is retained []. It is not clear whether HYLS‐1 comprises part of the transition fibre or another distal end basal body structure, but uncovering its precise localization might help elucidate its function in ciliogenesis. What is clear from the C. elegans findings, however, is that in the nematode at least, the distal end of the basal body, including the transition fibres, is sufficient for sustaining the function of IFT and cilia.
Function of the transition zone region as a ciliary gate
As discussed above, a transition zone forms in the early stages of ciliogenesis, probably stabilizing basal body–membrane connections and contributing to compartmentalization. There is increasing evidence that the mature transition zone functions as a ciliary gatekeeper. It has been ascribed two functions so far—a membrane diffusion barrier and a modulator of IFT.
The earliest concrete indication that the transition zone operates as a selective membrane diffusion barrier was obtained by the authors of [], who observed the distribution of rhodopsin in mechanically dissociated rod photoreceptor cells. Vertebrate photoreceptors are comprised of a cell body, the inner segment, a transition zone often termed connecting cilium, and an expanded ciliary tip, the outer segment. Rhodopsin was found to diffuse from its normal site of action, in the outer segment, to the inner segment, but only if the two were serendipitously fused together rather than separated by the transition zone. Indeed, the diffusion rate of the membrane‐associated rhodopsin to the inner segment was found to be identical to that of its usual diffusion rate within the outer segment, demonstrating that an intact transition zone limits this diffusion.
Studies in divergent species have corroborated roles for specific components of the transition zone in regulating entry or exit of membrane proteins into the cilium. In mammalian cells, several proteins display altered ciliary localization on siRNA‐mediated disruption of transition zone proteins. These include membrane‐associated GPI–GFP and GFP‐tagged CEACAM1, which accumulate at higher levels in cilia with dysfunctional transition zones []. Conversely, some mammalian ciliary proteins, namely AC3 and PKD2, are lost from transition zone protein‐deficient cilia []. In C. elegans, abrogation of six different transition‐zone‐localized proteins causes abnormal ciliary entry of the TRAM protein and membrane‐associated RP2 homologues []. Interestingly, the cilia of one of the C. elegans mutants analysed, mks‐6, shows an essentially normal cilium transition zone ultrastructure, suggesting specific disruption and malfunction, for example, of the necklace rather than complete removal of the Y‐links or ciliary gate. This situation might be comparable with that found in vertebrates, in which abrogation of individual transition zone proteins, including Mks6/Cc2d2a, impairs cilium formation in some tissues but is dispensible for ciliogenesis in others []. Further evidence of a role for the transition zone in bidirectional gating has come from comparing the ciliary proteomes of wild‐type and mutant Chlamydomonas. Specifically, disruption of the Y‐link‐localized Chlamydomonas CEP290/NPHP6 orthologue results in defects in the linker structures and altered composition of the motile cilia, including accumulation of the IFT‐associated BBS4 protein and reduction in PKD2 [].
Although it is striking that many transition zone proteins uncovered so far are membrane‐associated (i.e. have transmembrane or lipid‐interacting C2/B9 domains), consistent with a role in regulating the diffusion of membrane‐associated proteins, how they do so remains unknown. One possibility, which remains to be explored, is that the transition zone proteins alter the lipid composition compared with that of the plasma membrane and perhaps the rest of the cilium, helping to restrict membrane protein diffusion. Another intriguing possibility, not mutually exclusive, is that they functionally interact with the IFT machinery, which itself is implicated in the entry and exit of proteins into cilia. In mammalian cells, the IFT protein Fleer/DYF1 interacts with a transition zone protein, B9D2/MKS10, that is necessary for the transport of opsin to the outer segment of photoreceptor cells []. Similarly, another transition zone localized protein, LCA5/lebercilin, associates with IFT particles and is required for opsin localization to the photoreceptor outer segment; most significantly, LCA5 mutations found in patients affect binding to IFT proteins []. Finally, the authors of [] demonstrated that abrogation of the connecting cilium (transition zone)‐localized NPHP1 protein impairs transport of opsins to the outer segment, coincident with the reduced presence of some, although not all, IFT proteins in this region.
In C. elegans, disrupting any single transition zone protein does not abrogate ciliogenesis, nor impair IFT [,]. However, genetics studies define two transition zone modules that are collectively required for cilium formation—an NPHP module comprised of NPHP1 and NPHP4, and an MKS module consisting of MKS1, B9D1/MKSR‐1, B9D2/MKSR‐2, MKS3, MKS6/CC2D2A, and probably also TMEM216/MKS2 and TMEM237/JBTS14 [,]. Simultaneously deleting one component from each module abrogates ciliogenesis in most cilia, because of impaired attachment of the basal body‐transition zone to the membrane. In those cilia that remain, IFT velocities along axonemes are not markedly affected, suggesting that the transition zone is not absolutely necessary for IFT []. Hints of a functional interaction between the transition zone and IFT machinery do exist in C. elegans, as overexpression of OSM‐6/IFT52 and loss of NPHP4 function result in a synthetic ciliogenic defect []. Thus, further testing for genetic and physical interactions between IFT and transition zone genes in C. elegans and other species, such as zebrafish, is probably a useful avenue of investigation.
Whilst evidence for regulated entry or exit of ciliary membrane proteins is mounting, the question of whether the transition zone controls the ciliary localization of all or most components deserves attention. Two recent studies addressed this question by showing that soluble proteins and dextrans above ∼40–50 kDa were excluded from the Xenopus photoreceptor outer segment and from RPE1 primary cilia [,]. However, by using photoactivatable GFP, the Xenopus study also showed that flux of monomeric, dimeric and trimeric GFP across the photoreceptor connecting cilium was essentially identical, thus arguing against a diffusion barrier model of exclusion for soluble proteins at the connecting cilium []. Consistent with these findings, a previous study showed that monomeric GFP diffusion across the connecting cilium was only moderately reduced compared with inner segment flux, and that it is much faster than outer segment flux []. Thus, for soluble cytoplasmic proteins, transition zone gating might not involve a diffusion barrier mechanism such as that proposed for membrane‐assocated proteins.
Parallels between nucleo‐ and ciliocytoplasmic transport
An early suggestion that the ciliary base forms a ‘flagellar and ciliary pore complex’, analogous to the nuclear pore complex (NPC; []) was prescient, as recent studies suggest functional similarities between nucleocytoplasmic and ciliary transport machineries. Importin‐β1, importin‐β2/transportin, and RanBP1 are found within cilia, with a gradient of RanGTP and RanGDP across the basal body, similar to that observed across the nuclear envelope (Fig 3; [,,,]). The accumulation of RP2 and the IFT anterograde motor KIF17 in cilia requires importin‐β2, and elegant experiments that use a transient fast upregulation system showed that KIF17 ciliary targeting requires a ciliary RanGTP gradient [,]. Moreover, RanGTP was found to promote ciliogenesis through a mechanism dependent on RanBP1 []. Consistent with these findings, the importin‐β2 interaction with RP2 and KIF17 depends on nuclear‐import‐related sequences [,]. A recent and exciting study from the Verhey lab has now identified further NPC components—mainly nucleoporin proteins—at the base of cultured mammalian cell cilia in a region that includes the transition zone; furthermore, disruption of NPC function by using an antibody blocking approach restricts KIF17 ciliary entry [].
Other connections between nucleocytoplasmic and ciliary transport are that numerous nuclear transport proteins are present in ciliary proteomes [,], and various IFT and BBS proteins share rare domain architectures—β‐propeller‐toroid domains—with membrane curvature‐inducing and stabilizing NPC proteins []. As cilia are not fully bound by membrane, it remains unclear how cilium‐based NPC proteins and associated nucleocytoplasmic transport machineries would regulate the ciliary entry of membrane‐associated (RP2) and cytoplasmic (KIF17) proteins. One possible scenario mirrors nuclear‐envelope‐independent functions already known for the nucleocytoplasmic transport machinery. For example, when the nuclear envelope is broken during mitosis in Xenopus embryos, RanGTP concentration gradients emanating from condensed chromosomes regulate local release of spindle assembly factors from inhibitory interactions with importin‐α/β complexes [,]. For ciliary transport, similar modes of regulation involving Ran, nucleoporins and importin proteins, could facilitate protein transport across the base of cilia near the transition fibre/transition zone gate. Further understanding requires more knowledge of the full complement of nuclear import and export components that drive ciliary transport, where exactly they localize in cilia, and how they interact with known ciliary transport, for example IFT, and with transition zone, for example MKS/NPHP, functional modules.
Septins as part of a diffusion barrier at the base of the cilium
Septins are GTPases that form large‐order structures, including rings, gauzes and filaments. In budding yeast, a septin ring assembles at the bud neck during cytokinesis to prevent missegregation of organelles and proteins between mother and daughter cells [,]. Septins are also implicated in forming barriers in other locales, including the mammalian midbody, neural dendrite spines and sperm annulus [,]. To form high‐order structures, septins associate with other family members. For example, in sperm, septin 7 co‐localizes with septin 4 at the annulus [,].
The annulus forms early in sperm flagellum biogenesis at the base, where it might help anchor the overlying membrane to the flagellum []. Septin 4 localizes to this annulus and is essential for male mouse fertility; mice lacking this protein show retention of cytoplasm and defects in flagellar kinesin localization [,]. Septin 4 also controls the levels and distribution of basigin, a dynamically regulated flagellar component, consistent with an essential role for septin 4 as part of a flagellar diffusion barrier.
Septin 2, which associates with septin 7, localizes at the ciliary base (Fig 3; [,]). In IMCD3 mouse kidney cells, GFP fusions of several transmembrane proteins, including serotonin receptor 6, Smoothened and fibrocystin, localize to the cilia. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching indicates that there is little exchange between the ciliary and nonciliary pools of these transmembrane proteins, despite both populations being mobile []. Knockdown of septin 2 causes defects in ciliogenesis, and the short cilia that do form show increased entry of ciliary transmembrane proteins []. Thus, septin 2 probably functions as an important part of a diffusion barrier at the base of the cilium.
In Xenopus, septin 2 is expressed with septin 7 during gastrulation, when it stabilizes the plasma membrane and coordinates convergent extension []. Similar to septin 2 in IMCD3 cells, septin 7 forms a ring at the base of motile cilia in the Xenopus epidermis, and knockdown results in fewer and shortened cilia. Consistent with an essential role for cilia in vertebrate Hedgehog signal transduction, knockdown of either septin 2 or septin 7 abrogates Hedgehog signalling [,]. Thus, septin 2 and septin 7, which can interact, could partner to participate in the diffusion barrier at the ciliary base.
The findings raise interesting questions. How might septins promote ciliogenesis? Septin 2 and septin 7 can associate with and arrange the distribution of microtubules to control vesicular transport [,]. Do septins coordinate the distribution of microtubules required to deliver ciliary components to the basal body, or stabilize the microtubules of the cilium itself? If so, this might explain how septins promote ciliogenesis. Given that the authors of [] demonstrated mislocalization of transition zone proteins on siRNA knockdown of septin 2, it will be interesting to further probe the functional relationship between the ciliary septin ring and the transition zone. For example, are they part of the same or are they distinct mechanisms for regulating ciliary composition?
It has been known for over 30 years that the transition fibres, together with the transition zone Y‐links, represent evolutionarily conserved subdomains of the basal body–ciliary organelle that connect microtubules to the ciliary membrane []. We have gained valuable insights into their roles in cilium biogenesis, maintenance and functions. Yet, a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms of transition fibre–transition zone function is only possible once we enumerate their components and define their macromolecular organization (Sidebar A). Furthermore, continuing to uncover the specific functional associations between transition fibre and transition zone components, and other ciliary components as well as transport machinery, for example IFT, will help to elucidate their crucial roles in not only the formation, but also the function of the cilium.
Sidebar A | In need of answers
What is the full complement of proteins that make up transition fibres and the different elements of the transition zone, for example Y‐links and ciliary necklace?
Can the transition fibres or Y‐links be isolated biochemically to ascertain composition?
What are the precise three‐dimensional shapes of transition fibres and Y‐links? Cryo‐electron microscopy reconstruction analyses could provide sufficient structural details such that, ultimately, crystal structures of individual components could be “fitted’ or modelled into the macromolecular assemblies. Understanding the spatial relationships between the various components is necessary for understanding, at a molecular level, the potentially diverse functions of the ciliary gate structures.
What are the interaction partners of proteins present in the transition fibre–transition zone region? Some of these might bind only transiently, play roles in the formation of the ciliary gate, or could regulate docking and transport of intraflagellar transport particles.
Where exactly, in the context of the transition fibres and transition zone, are the septin and RP2 rings localized, and how might they collaborate with these ciliary domains in ciliary gating or transport?
To what extent do nuclear pore‐associated proteins regulate ciliary transport? Is it only to modulate ciliary entry of the kinesin motor KIF17 (OSM‐3) and RP2, or other proteins as well?
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
We apologize to our colleagues whose findings could not be covered due to space constraints. This work was funded by grants to M.R.L. from the March of Dimes and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; grant CP166387), to O.E.B. from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2009 (grant 241955, SYSCILIA), and to J.F.R. from the National Institutes of Health (AR054396, GM095941), the Packard Foundation and the Sandler Family Supporting Foundation. M.R.L. acknowledges a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR) senior scholar award.
See Glossary for abbreviations used in this article.
- adenylyl cyclase 3
- abnormal DYe‐Filling 1 gene
- carcinoembryonic antigen‐related cell adhesion molecule 1
- centrosomal protein
- hydrolethalus syndrome protein 1
- kinesin family member 17
- outer dense fibre 2
- polycystic kidney disease 2
- proteome of centriole 5
- retinitis pigmentosa 2
- retinal pigment epithelial cell line
- spindle assembly abnormal 4
- septin 2
- small interfering RNA
- translocating chain‐associating membrane
- Copyright © 2012 European Molecular Biology Organization